As a sponsor or CRO, you’ll often be involved with bringing in a patient recruitment solutions provider to augment your enrollment activities.

Unfortunately, not all of the vendors you might bring on board are as good as each other. And there is often an issue of lack of transparency and visibility regarding what they are doing.

I’ve worked in an advisory capacity on recruitment projects where it has became obvious the vendor was not doing a good job in terms of results. And also those where vendors were doing an even worse job of keeping the client informed about activity.

A major warning sign is if they suggest scrapping the methods they’ve originally been brought in to use, and proposing a completely different method through a partner organization. Effectively admitting they can’t deliver what they’d originally said they could. In these situations, I recommend moving on and finding a better vendor.

You may also like

Gaining Clarity on your Requirements Before Designing your Trial Helps Save Time and Resource
I’ve mentioned before about how many trial protocols feature copied and pasted elements from previous trials, and how this isn’t necessarily the best way to go about designing a new trial. ...
Moving Away from Embedded Relationships to Exploring Opportunities with New Vendors
When embarking on a clinical trial outsourcing process, sponsor companies will often simply engage those organizations they’ve worked with before. In particular when it comes to selecting a ...
Collaboration Among Patient Recruitment Stakeholders - Including Vendors - is Recommended
While talking with several vendors in the clinical trials space recently, I was reminded of the wealth of experience from people who work on that side of the industry - including many of ...