It seems that many people within the industry are keen to move forward with a collaborative relationship between all the main stakeholders when it comes to patient recruitment – ie patients, research sites, CROs, sponsors, solutions providers, patient groups etc.

But I’m not sure I actually see a lot of evidence of this ‘in the field’.

Indeed, it’s always struck me as being odd that the term used to describe a CRO explaining its proposal items to a sponsor is ‘bid defense’. Which seems to automatically put the relationship into an adversarial one – with one of the parties having to defend itself against attack from the other.

In order to foster an environment where truly collaborative relationships can develop, I would suggest changing from ‘bid defense meeting’ to something like ‘strategy development meeting’ might be beneficial.

As would be setting up effective feedback loops between all the stakeholders for better communication and ongoing improvements.

You may also like

You Should have Respect for the Disease and the Patient Recruitment Process Itself
Respect for the disease or condition that the potential treatment is designed to work on is another essential factor. When I talk about respect in this regard, I mean being aware of the ...
Showing Respect for All the Stakeholders in the Patient Recruitment Process
Respect for the other stakeholders in the field of patient recruitment is based on recognizing that everyone is fundamentally trying to do the best they can. There is often a finger pointing ...
The Core Value of Respect Should run Through all Your Patient Recruitment Activities
In the final 3 short vids I’ll be doing this year before taking a break, I want to mention the core value that everyone involved in clinical trials should keep at the heart of everything ...