Coming from a background where customer experience methodology is used extensively to determine why people don’t like a particular product or service, it’s always intrigued me as to why there is no standard process in place for asking patients why they drop out of trials.

It’s possible this is based on an interpretation of the Declaration of Helsinki – that enshrines a trial participant’s right to withdraw from a trial at any point in the process.

However, I would suggest that’s a misinterpretation. The right to drop out of a trial at any point does not mean we can’t ask the person why they have done so.

Given that retaining patients on trials is probably the second biggest issue outside of recruiting them in the first place, I’d suggest that finding out why people drop out should provide valuable information for the design of future trials that have a better rate of retention.

You may also like

You Should have Respect for the Disease and the Patient Recruitment Process Itself
Respect for the disease or condition that the potential treatment is designed to work on is another essential factor. When I talk about respect in this regard, I mean being aware of the ...
Showing Respect for All the Stakeholders in the Patient Recruitment Process
Respect for the other stakeholders in the field of patient recruitment is based on recognizing that everyone is fundamentally trying to do the best they can. There is often a finger pointing ...
The Core Value of Respect Should run Through all Your Patient Recruitment Activities
In the final 3 short vids I’ll be doing this year before taking a break, I want to mention the core value that everyone involved in clinical trials should keep at the heart of everything ...